Report for CertTech TestStand Tool Qualification Kit. Tool Qualification Kit Compliances/Findings. Review Job Aid Conducting Software Reviews.
- Kelly Murphy
- 3 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Software Review Job Aid - Supplement # Rev 1 (preliminary) July 17, Typical Roles and Responsibilities of the FAA Software Team January 16, 2004
2 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE SW-ASE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SW-ASE S IN SOFTWARE APPROVALS UNDER THE TC/ATC/STC PROCESSES Communication and Planning Implementation Future Planning and Involvement ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SW-ASE S IN THE SOFTWARE ASPECTS OF THE PRODUCTION CERTIFICATE PROCESS ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SW-ASE S IN THE SOFTWARE ASPECTS OF THE PARTS MANUFACTURER APPROVAL (PMA) PROCESS ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SW-ASE S IN THE SOFTWARE ASPECTS OF THE TECHNICAL STANDARD ORDER AUTHORIZATION (TSOA) PROCESS Description of the TSOA Process Evaluating Capability Issuance of a TSOA Roles and Responsibilities in the TSOA Process ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SW-ASE S IN THE SOFTWARE ASPECTS OF THE ACSEP PROCESS ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SW-ASE S IN THE SOFTWARE ASPECTS OF THE CERTIFICATE MANAGEMENT PROCESS ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SW-ASE S IN THE SOFTWARE ASPECTS OF THE DESIGNEE MANAGEMENT PROCESS ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SOFTWARE CSTA CSTA TECHNICAL LEADER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: CSTA CERTIFICATION SOFTWARE TEAM ADVISOR ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SOFTWARE TS TS TECHNICAL EXPERT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: TS CERTIFICATION SOFTWARE TEAM MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DIRECTORATE STAFF THE DIRECTORATE STAFF ASSUMES THESE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HEADQUARTERS STAFF... 12
3 1.0 Introduction This document describes the roles and responsibilities of the FAA s software team. The team may include the following members: Aviation Safety Engineer responsible for the software approval (SW-ASE), Chief Scientific and Technical Advisor (CSTA), Technical Specialist (TS), Directorate personnel, and/or Headquarters personnel. The typical roles and responsibilities for each team member will be discussed below. 2.0 Roles and Responsibilities for the SW-ASE The SW-ASE is the ACO engineer responsible for software review and approval. This section describes the roles and responsibilities for SW-ASE s for each of the following processes: (1) Type Certificate, Amended Type Certificate, Supplemental Type Certificate (TC/ATC/STC) Process (2) Production Certificate (PC) Process (3) Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) Process (4) Technical Standard Order Authorization (TSOA) Process (5) Aircraft Certification Systems Evaluation Program (ACSEP) Process (6) Certificate Management Process (7) Designee Management Process 2.1 Roles and Responsibilities of SW-ASE s in Software Approvals under the TC/ATC/STC Processes The process for approving software in TC/ATC/STC projects involves three roles for the SW-ASE: (1) communicating with the applicant and planning the project, (2) implementing the review and approval, and (3) determining the future level of involvement based on lessons learned Communication and Planning At the beginning of a project, the SW-ASE should carry out communication with the applicant in order to plan the workload, number of software reviews, amount of delegation, etc. The roles and responsibilities of the SW-ASE during the communication and planning process are shown in Table
4 TABLE 1 - Roles and Responsibilities for SW-ASE s in the Communication and Planning for the Software Aspects of the TC/ATC/STC Process Participate in Type Board/Familiarization meeting. Determine level of FAA involvement for software aspects of project. Assess if unique design or new technology is being proposed (to determine if CSTA, TS, Directorate personnel, or HQ personnel should be involved). Determine designee utilization and resource availability. Coordinate software effort with Project Manager. Determine software level(s) based on System Safety Assessment (SSA). Determine the software life cycle data to be submitted. Review PSAC. If necessary, review the Software Configuration Management Plan (SCMP), the Software Quality Assurance Plan (SQAP), the Software Development Plan (SDP), and the Software Verification Plan (SVP). Provide comment to applicant and obtain resolution of plan deficiencies. Provide software input to CPP or equivalent project level plan, including designee delegation plans and interactions during the project. Resolve any discrepancies in plans with applicant Implementation Implementation of a project is the process of assuring the applicant s software life cycle processes comply with their approved plans and approving their data submittals after determining compliance with DO-178B or other acceptable means. Implementation may require on-site software reviews, desk-top reviews, and review of designee findings by the SW-ASE. SW-ASE s roles and responsibilities for implementation of the software review and approval are shown in Table 2. TABLE 2 - Roles and Responsibilities of SW-ASE s in the Implementation of the TC/ATC/STC Process Approve PSAC and, if necessary, SCMP, SQAP, SDP, and SVP. Monitor the applicant s compliance to their plans. Resolve applicant process discrepancies with the approved software plans and DO- 178B or acceptable alternative. Coordinate tasks to support desk-top and on-site reviews. Perform on-site review, desk-top review, designee delegation, or a combination. Coordinate with systems certification Software Team. Identify and request specific conformity items. Approve Software Configuration Index (SCI) and Software Accomplishment Summary (SWAS). Identify discrepancies and coordinate resolution. Identify process improvement opportunities. 1-2
5 2.2.3 Future Planning and Involvement At the end of each software review or approval, the SW-ASE may want to identify areas for both the FAA and the applicant to improve upon. 2.3 Roles and Responsibilities of SW-ASE s in the Software Aspects of the Production Certificate Process. The Production Certificate (PC) process begins with the application. The normal process for issuance of a PC is to follow Order A, Production Approval and Surveillance Procedures. The cognizant MIDO, MISO, or CMO may conduct a preliminary audit of the applicant s Quality Control (QC) system and production facilities to ensure compliance with the applicable Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and policy. The PC project may be assessed during the preliminary audit to determine whether the applicant is involved in airborne software development and computer aided design, manufacturing, inspection, and test (CADMIT) tools. The FAA assesses the project to ensure that the airborne and CADMIT software is addressed in the QC and SCM systems. A Production Certification Board (PCB) may be convened for initial production approvals to evaluate the preliminary audit findings and recommendations from the cognizant MIDO, MISO, or CMO. The issuance of the PC is primarily the responsibility of the MIDO, MISO, or CMO. However, the SW-ASE might be requested to assist the manufacturing office in evaluation of automated inspection or test equipment used to verify type design. 2.4 Roles and Responsibilities of SW-ASE s in the Software Aspects of the Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) Process. The PMA process begins with the application for PMA. The normal process for issuance of PMA is to follow Order , Parts Manufacturer Approval Procedures. This process applies to anyone producing replacement or modification parts for sale for installation on type certified products. Applicants may obtain design approval on replacement or modification parts through Identicality, or Licensing Agreements. Production manufacturing approval is obtained through the MIDO or MISO inspector s acceptance of the applicant s fabrication inspection system and evaluation of applicant s facility to determine applicant s compliance to 14 CFR part 21, Subpart K. Since software has some unique characteristics, chapter 6 of Order 8110.SW, Guidelines for the approval of Field-Loadable Software by Finding Identicality through the Parts Manufacturer Approval Process, identifies the PMA process for field-loadable software. Field-loadable software is where PMAs are typically desired for software. At present, the test and computation approach is not supported for PMA software. Table 3 describes the roles and responsibilities for the SW-ASE to be performed for: (1) PMA application, (2) approval by identicality with licensing agreement, and (3) approval 1-3
6 by identicality without licensing agreement. This specifically applies to PMA for software. Reference Order 8110.SW, as needed. Function SW-ASE Roles and Responsibilities PMA Application Determine level of FAA software involvement. Determine designee utilization and resource availability. Coordinate software effort with Project Manager. Coordinate with the systems certification Software Team. Establish certification basis. Participate in familiarization and technical meetings. Review applicant s software plans. Determine if unique design or new technology warrants coordination with CSTA, TS, Directorate, or Headquarters personnel. Resolve plan discrepancies with the applicant. Perform on-site reviews, desk-top reviews, designee delegation, or combination, as necessary. Identify discrepancies. Review SCI and SWAS. Identicality With Licensing Agreement SW-ASE is typically not involved, unless requested by the manufacturing office. Identicality Without Specify software life cycle data to be submitted. Licensing Agreement Review submitted software life cycle data and resolve discrepancies with applicant. Verify approved software configuration. Table 3. Roles and Responsibilities for SW-ASE s in the PMA Process 2.5 Roles and Responsibilities of SW-ASE s in the Software Aspects of the Technical Standard Order Authorization (TSOA) Process. The TSOA is a joint authorization by both the ACO and MIDO or MISO, and has many similarities to the TC/ATC/STC process. The normal process to obtain a TSOA is to follow Order A. However, the TSOA process also has some unique characteristics that are described below Description of the TSOA Process The TSOA is an authorization to manufacture equipment that meets TSO-specified requirements; it is not approval to install the equipment on an aircraft or engine. The design portion of the TSOA process is responsibility of the applicant. The applicant submits the TSO data package and a statement of compliance to the ACO. Most TSO authorizations are granted based on a review of the data package, reliance on the applicant s statement of compliance, and an evaluation of the capability of the applicant 1-4
7 to produce the TSO equipment. FAA acceptance of TSO systems with embedded software is based on a review of the TSO data package for compliance with RTCA DO- 178[] or other acceptable means, as well as the applicant s statement of compliance that the TSO article meets the performance specifications of the TSO. Once the TSO is granted, the TC of the aircraft may need to be amended or supplemented to allow the TSOA equipment to be installed on the aircraft. Granting a TSOA is, in and of itself, not sufficient substantiation to amend a TC; installation substantiation is required also. The TSOA process may begin with an initial familiarization meeting, a letter of intent or application, where the applicant s project schedule and plans are discussed. Applicants should be encouraged to seek software expertise and FAA involvement early in the project. The FAA can provide guidance on software compliance and certification concerns. The applicant may want to discuss with the FAA such areas as: the certification plans; especially the PSAC, the system safety assessment, human factors issues, failure condition categories, software levels, software and hardware partitioning, etc. The SW-ASE evaluation begins after the submission of the completed TSO data package. TSO requirements sometimes specify the data submittal requirements. If they don t, the applicant should submit the PSAC, SCI, and SWAS. The ACO SW-ASE may request additional data be submitted. The evaluation consists of the following: 1. review of applicant s statement of compliance; 2. review TSO data submittals, including software life cycle data; and 3. recommend approval or denial of deviations. The manufacturing office will evaluate the QC manual for compliance with the applicable CFR, policy, and verification of implementation compliance with the manual Evaluating Capability As part of assessing the applicant s capability to make statements of compliance, the FAA must assess the company s capability to produce software in compliance with the appropriate software level of DO-178[]. The assessment may be accomplished through an FAA software review conducted by a team. Once the FAA has determined the applicant capable, the applicant may be deemed capable for that level of software Issuance of a TSOA If the Software Team finds all submittals from the applicant acceptable, the TSOA is issued. If the applicant s request is denied, the reason for denial should be communicated to the applicant. When acceptable corrections are made, the TSOA may be issued. Deviations are evaluated by engineering and a recommendation to approve or deny, with substantiating data, is provided to Headquarters (AIR-100) for concurrence. AIR-100 will communicate approval or denial of the deviations to the local ACO who provides a formal response to the applicant. 1-5
8 2.5.4 Roles and Responsibilities in the TSOA Process Table 4 below describes roles and responsibilities of the SW-ASE in TSOA project familiarization and evaluation. TABLE 4 - Roles and Responsibilities for SW-ASE for Software Aspects of the TSOA Project Review applicant statement of compliance and TSO data package submitted with TSO application. Participate in familiarization meeting Determine software level of FAA involvement for TSO. Review software life cycle data of TSO data package. Assess software level acceptability. Request additional software data to be submitted as necessary to substantiate compliance. Perform on-site or desk reviews, as necessary to substantiate compliance. Evaluate deviation requests, send recommendations to AIR-100, and forward resolution to applicant. Resolve any discrepancies with the applicant. Send TSOA letter to applicant. 2.6 Roles and Responsibilities of SW-ASE s in the Software Aspects of the ACSEP Process The production approval holder s SQA and SCM processes and Quality Control system are evaluated to the criteria found in Order , Aircraft Certification Systems Evaluation Program (ACSEP). Individuals assigned to review the software sub-system might comprise of one or more SW-ASE s and/or Aviation Safety Inspectors (ASI), possibly flight test pilots. If more than one individual is participating in the review, than one will be assigned the role of software team leader. Table 5 defines the roles and responsibilities for the SW-ASE or ASE who is performing the software aspects of ACSEP evaluations. TABLE 5 - Roles and Responsibilities for Software Aspects of the ACSEP Evaluation Examine the software quality process per the ACSEP order. Document findings and observations. Monitor corrective actions. 1-6
9 2.7 Roles and Responsibilities for SW-ASE s in the Software Aspects of the Certificate Management Process The Certificate Management process begins with the issuance of a new approval, a scheduled visit, or information from manufacturing. Certificate Management for systems with software (and the scheduled visits portion of certificate management) is an activity for both engineering and manufacturing inspection. Certificate Management is an ongoing process that applies to TC/ATC/STC, PC, TSOA, and PMA products. Certificate Management of software systems should be proactive and may include: evaluation of the software development processes, if not previously reviewed (TC/ATC/STC/TSOA); evaluation of the SCM change process (e.g., design change, change control, baseline change, specification change notices, etc.); an evaluation of the SCM data retention and retrieval; verification that the software can be built, linked, and loaded into production units using approved procedures; analysis of product service history, including problem reports, accident/incident databases, Airworthiness Directives databases, System Deficiency Report databases to aid in determining the quality of the original development subsequent changes. This provides feedback to FAA manufacturing and engineering offices for continuous improvement activities; an assurance that manufacturing, test, and inspection software is controlled in compliance with the QA system and SCM; and Reevaluate SQA and SCM processes to ensure continued acceptability. The above activities may result in a report of findings relevant to compliance with Order A, Compliance and Enforcement Program, from the ACO or MIDO. Table 6 defines the typical roles and responsibilities for the SW-ASE for the software aspects of Certificate Management. TABLE 6 SW-ASE Roles and Responsibilities Certificate Management Process Review Service Difficulty Reports for software related trends. Approve Service Bulletins. Draft Airworthiness Directives. Discuss SQA and SCM deficiencies with applicant. Evaluate the software life cycle processes, if problems arise. 1-7
10 2.8 Roles and Responsibilities for SW-ASE s in the Software Aspects of the Designee Management Process Much of the software aspects of certification are delegated to the Designated Engineering Representative (DER). The process of managing designees who perform software functions needs to take into consideration the following: (1) Designee qualification, selection, and orientation. (2) Oversight of designee usage on projects. (3) Oversight of designee approval and activities. (4) Designee renewal and evaluation. (5) Training of designees. Table 7 defines the roles and responsibilities for the Designee advisor and SW-ASE to be performed for the software aspects of Designee Management. TABLE 7 - Roles and Responsibilities of SW-ASE for Designee Management Evaluate designee qualifications to the criteria of the appropriate Order. Participate in training and mentoring activities to prepare the designees. Apply the designee appointment and renewal procedures required by FAA Orders. Evaluate level of designee activity. 1-8
11 3.0 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SOFTWARE CSTA The CSTA provides professional technical guidance, advice and assistance within the FAA and to the aviation industry. They are the FAA s direct link to an extensive professional network in the research and development community, professional and academic organizations, private industry, other government and regulatory authorities, and national and international experts in the field of software. The CSTA operates in the role of technical leader and certification Software Team advisor. The roles and responsibilities of the CSTA in both capacities are described below: 3.1 CSTA Technical Leader Roles and Responsibilities: Consults on programs that are applying new technology. Initiates and serves on committees regarding standardization of new technology areas. Addresses issues that require precedent setting approaches to policy and means of compliance. Assists Directorate and Headquarters staffs in understanding technology and related issues in order to develop rules and policy guidance. Educates Headquarters, Technical Specialists, Directorate Staff, SW-ASE s, SW-ASI s and Designees regarding new technology compliance issues. Conducts research and development in the areas of specialty and responsibilities. 3.2 CSTA Certification Software Team Advisor Roles and Responsibilities: Attends familiarization meetings, when requested. Advise the Software Team on issues that require precedent setting approaches to policy and means of compliance. Participates in Special Certification Reviews, Critical Design Reviews, and Multiple Expert Opinion Software Teams. Participates in formal technical Software Team meetings. Provides timely response to Software Team for methods of compliance or precedent-setting design features. Assists SW-ASE, SW-ASI, and applicant in understanding new technology and related issues and identifying means of compliance. 1-9
12 4.0 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SOFTWARE TS The TS provides technical expertise to the FAA in the area of software and acts as the focal point for issues of software technology. The TS is responsible for being current on the latest technologies, methods, and policies by working closely with the CSTA, Standards and MIO staff of the Directorates, and Headquarters. The TS operates in the role of technical expert and certification Software Team member. The roles and responsibilities of the TS in each of these capacities are described below: 4.1 TS Technical Expert Roles and Responsibilities: Assists ACO s, MIDO s, Directorate Staff, and Headquarters in establishing policy and procedures regarding software issues. Participates in meetings with the CSTA and industry. Mentoring and assists SW-ASE and SW-ASI on software issues. Provides an evaluation of the SQA subsystem when requested to participate on an ACSEP review. Participates on industry Software Teams to establish standards and guidance. Provides expertise within discipline. 4.2 TS Certification Software Team Member Roles and Responsibilities: Participates in projects involving new technology or new application of technology. When requested by ACO, evaluates software life cycle processes during certification projects. When requested by ACO, evaluates SCM and SQA processes for airborne systems and manufacturing operations to assure post-certification compliance. Identifies compliance issues. When requested by ACO, conducts software reviews and inspections. Provides technical recommendations to SW-ASE s and SW-ASI s. 1-10
13 5.0 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DIRECTORATE STAFF The Directorate Staff consists of both the standards staff and the manufacturing inspection office. The Directorate Staff provides part-specific and project-specific rules and policy to the certification Software Team. They are also the focal point within the Directorate for policy. 5.1 The Directorate Staff assumes these roles and responsibilities: Provides input to Headquarters to ensure national policy is consistent with Directorate (Part 23, 25, 27, 29, 33, 35) policy. Participate in familiarization meetings for significant projects. Identifies and clarifies software policy for the ACO s and MIDO s. Assists the ACO s and MIDO s in formalizing their concerns with policy implementation problems to Headquarters. Encourages and ensures standardized application of national policy and regulations. Encourages the definition of design features and methods of compliance early in the project. Represents the Directorate at technical forums and meetings that involve software. Assists Headquarters in the development of regulations and national policy. Recommends issues requiring national policy to Headquarters. Participates in software reviews, as requested. Provides software process evaluation expertise as project Software Team member. Works with the CSTA and TS on national software issues. Serves as technical expert, as requested. 1-11
14 6.0 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HEADQUARTERS STAFF The Headquarters staff assumes the following roles and responsibilities for software aspects of certification: Serves as focal point working with Directorate Staff, CSTA, TS, ACO s and MIDO s to ensure policy and guidance standardization among all Directorates. Develops new policy, guidance, and regulations based on input from CSTA, TS, Directorate Staff, ACO s, MIDO s, and Industry. Interprets and explains policy and guidance to the Directorate Staff, ACO s and MIDO s Serves as liaison among different FAA communities. Participates in projects that require changes or additions to national software policy. Develops national training programs to promote standardization throughout AIR. Sponsors national software standardization conferences. Manages Research and Development programs involving software. Promotes international harmonization. Serves as the federal representative on national software committees. Works closely with Headquarters management Software Teams. Serves as technical expert during a software review, as requested. 1-12
Rev 1 January 16, 2004
1010011101010011110001101001101101101101000100110010101011100010110 0110100110110110110100010010001010101110001011000100111010100111100 1110100110110110110100010010001010101110001011000100111010100111100
More informationAC 20-148 REUSABLE SOFTWARE COMPONENTS
AC 20-148 REUSABLE SOFTWARE COMPONENTS December 7, 2004 12/7/04 AC 20-148 CONTENTS Paragraph Title Page 1. Purpose....1 2. Motivation for this Guidance....1 3. Document Overview...1 4. General Guidelines
More informationOld Phase Description New Phase Description
Prologue This amendment of The FAA and Industry Guide to Product Certification (CPI Guide) incorporates changes based on lessons learned and supports the broader use of this guide by providing additional
More informationAdvisory Circular. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: Airborne Software Assurance Date: 07/19/2013 AC No: 20-115C Initiated by: AIR-120 Change: 1. Purpose of this
More informationCertification Authorities Software Team (CAST) Position Paper CAST-3
Certification Authorities Software Team (CAST) Position Paper CAST-3 Guidelines for Assuring the Software Aspects of Certification When Replacing Obsolete Electronic Parts Used in Airborne Systems and
More informationORDER 8150.1C. Effective Date: 03/08/12. Technical Standard Order Program
ORDER 8150.1C Effective Date: 03/08/12 SUBJ: Technical Standard Order Program This order explains how to evaluate and issue technical standard order (TSO) authorizations (TSOAs) and letters of TSO design
More informationAdvisory Circular. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration. Date: 06/10/2013 Initiated by: AIR-110
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: Certification Data Retention Agreements and Government Records Date: 06/10/2013 Initiated by: AIR-110 AC No:
More informationSpecial Permits Program Desk Guide
Special Permits Program Desk Guide Version 2.2 March 2016 Approvals Program Standard Operating Procedures Version 1.0 i Disclaimer The materials contained in this document consist of guidance and other
More informationCERTIFICATION MEMORANDUM
EASA CM No.: EASA CM SWCEH 002 Issue: 01 EASA CERTIFICATION MEMORANDUM EASA CM No.: EASA CM - SWCEH 002 Issue: 01 Issue Date: 11 th of August 2011 Issued by: Software & Complex Electronic Hardware section
More information3 August 2014. Software Safety and Security Best Practices A Case Study From Aerospace
3 August 2014 Software Safety and Security Best Practices A Case Study From Aerospace Agenda Introduction Why Aviation? ARINC 653 Real-time Linux on Xen (ARLX) Safety Artifacts for ARLX Security Artifacts
More informationSAFE SOFTWARE FOR SPACE APPLICATIONS: BUILDING ON THE DO-178 EXPERIENCE. Cheryl A. Dorsey Digital Flight / Solutions cadorsey@df-solutions.
SAFE SOFTWARE FOR SPACE APPLICATIONS: BUILDING ON THE DO-178 EXPERIENCE Cheryl A. Dorsey Digital Flight / Solutions cadorsey@df-solutions.com DIGITAL FLIGHT / SOLUTIONS Presentation Outline DO-178 Overview
More informationAI R C R AF T M AI N T E N AN C E S P E C I AL I S T Schematic Code 17801
I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK AI R C R AF T M AI N T E N AN C E S P E C I AL I S T Schematic Code 17801 Positions in this banded class perform inspection, maintenance, modification, and repair of systems for
More informationCQR-1 CONTRACTOR QUALITY REQUIREMENTS for CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
1.0 SCOPE CQR-1 CONTRACTOR QUALITY REQUIREMENTS for CONSTRUCTION SERVICES This document establishes the minimum quality program requirements for a contractor providing equipment, material, and construction
More informationAn Interactive Video Teletraining Course. IVT Course 62823 Self-Study Video Course 25823
Software Change Impact Analysis An Interactive Video Teletraining Course IVT Course 62823 Self-Study Video Course 25823 Developed and Presented by Leanna Rierson FAA, National Resource Specialist For Aircraft
More informationApprovals Program Desk Guide
Approvals Program Desk Guide Version 2.2 March 2016 Approvals Program Standard Operating Procedures Version 1.0 i Disclaimer The materials contained in this document consist of guidance and other information
More informationCamar Aircraft Products Co. QUALITY MANUAL Revision D
QUALITY MANUAL Revision D Gujll'y Manual Introduction The purpose of this manual is to describe the Quality Assurance Program implemented by Camar Aircraft Products Co. (hereafter referred to as C.A.P.C.)
More information1. Software Engineering Overview
1. Overview 1. Overview...1 1.1 Total programme structure...1 1.2 Topics covered in module...2 1.3 Examples of SW eng. practice in some industrial sectors...4 1.3.1 European Space Agency (ESA), software
More informationDRAFT (Public comments phase August 2006) Date: XX/XX/XX. Initiated by: ANE-110
(Public comments phase August 2006) Advisory Circular Subject: PROPOSED DRAFT Turbine Engine Repairs and Alterations Approval of Technical and Substantiation Data Date: XX/XX/XX Initiated by: ANE-110 AC
More informationMemorandum Date: February 5, 2014
Federal Aviation Administration Memorandum Date: February 5, 2014 To: From: Subject: Memo No.: See Distribution List David W. Hempe, Manager, Aircraft Engineering Division, AIR-100 James D. Seipel, Manager,
More informationU.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. National Policy
NOTICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION National Policy N 8900.102 Effective Date: 11/25/09 Cancellation Date: 11/25/10 SUBJ: OpSpec D091, Requirements Air Carrier Maintenance
More informationU.S. Department of Energy
U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. NOTICE DOE N 203.1 Approved: Expires: 06-02-01 SUBJECT: SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE 1. OBJECTIVES. To define requirements and responsibilities for software quality
More informationAdvisory Circular. Subject: DAMAGE TOLERANCE INSPECTIONS FOR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS. Date: 11/20/07 Initiated by: ANM-100.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: DAMAGE TOLERANCE INSPECTIONS FOR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS Date: 11/20/07 Initiated by: ANM-100 AC No: 120-93
More informationAirworthiness and Maintenance Requirements for U.S. Registered Aircraft
Airworthiness and Maintenance Requirements for U.S. Registered Aircraft State of Registry Requirements Designee Limits and Requirements Maintenance Requirements Presented to: LACAC Members By: Jaime Insurriaga
More informationAviation Suppliers Association Quality System Standard. ASA-100 Revision 4.0
Page 1 Aviation Suppliers Association Quality System Standard ASA-100 Revision 4.0 Original Issue: March 1994 Revision 4.0 Release Date: August 1, 2015 Effective Date: August 24, 2015 Copyright 1994-2015
More informationSubject Software Aspects of Certification
EASA NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSAL TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATION MEMORANDUM EASA Proposed CM No.: EASA CM - SWAEH 002 Issue: 02 Issue Date: 22 nd of October 2013 Issued by: Safety, Software & Airborne Electronic
More informationNASA MEDICAL POLICY BOARD AND AEROSPACE MEDICINE BOARD
NASA MEDICAL POLICY BOARD AND AEROSPACE MEDICINE BOARD 1. PURPOSE This charter establishes the Medical Policy Board (MPB) at NASA Headquarters (HQ) and the Aerospace Medicine Board (AMB) at the NASA Johnson
More informationNew Program Quality Requirements for Suppliers (NPQR) For Limited Manufacturing of Components and/or Processes for Engineering Certification
New Program Quality Requirements for Suppliers (NPQR) For Limited Manufacturing of Components and/or Processes for Engineering Certification Revision - New Program Quality Requirements for Suppliers Rev.
More informationRepair Station Training Suspected Unapproved Parts
Title 14 CFR Part 1 Part 21 Part 43 Part 45 Part 91 Part 121 Part 135 Part 145 Information & References Advisory Circular AC 21-29-B AC 20-62 General FAA Info Suspected Unapproved Parts Program Plan (Report
More informationDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION SUBJ: AVIATION SAFETY INSPECTOR CREDENTIAL PROGRAM
ORDER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 8000.38F 5/14/03 SUBJ: AVIATION SAFETY INSPECTOR CREDENTIAL PROGRAM 1. PURPOSE. This Order provides guidance on the agency policy and
More informationDate: 9/30/15 AC No: 119-1 Initiated by: AFS-300 Change: 0
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Subject: Airworthiness and Operational Authorization of Aircraft Network Security Program (ANSP) Advisory Circular Date: 9/30/15 AC No:
More informationRepair Station Training Program
AC 145 RSTP DATE: Repair Station Training Program Initiated by: AFS-300 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 100. Purpose of this advisory circular (AC).... 1 101. Who should use this AC....
More information2. APPLICABILITY. This AC provides information for any person who engages in public aircraft operations (PAO) as defined by the statute.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: Public Aircraft Operations Date: 2/12/14 Initiated by: AFS-800 AC No: 00-1.1A Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory
More informationFAA CONFORMITY INSPECTION PROCESS, FORMS AND RECORDS GUIDANCE MANUAL
FAA CONFORMITY INSPECTION PROCESS, FORMS AND RECORDS GUIDANCE MANUAL REVISION A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Transport Airplane Directorate FAA CONFORMITY INSPECTION PROCESS,
More informationIMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES AIRWORTHINESS
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES FOR AIRWORTHINESS Covering DESIGN APPROVAL, PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES, EXPORT AIRWORTHINESS APPROVAL, POST DESIGN APPROVAL ACTIVITIES, AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE BETWEEN AUTHORITIES
More informationU.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. Air Traffic Organization Policy
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy ORDER JO 1000.37A SUBJ: Air Traffic Organization Safety Management System Effective Date: 5/30/14 The mission
More informationQuality Management System-A Revision 7 (NRC-approved Version)
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 2013 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Quality Management System-A (NRC-approved Version) Westinghouse Electric Company Quality Management System
More informationWIND RIVER RTCA DO-178 SOFTWARE CERTIFICATION SERVICES
WIND RIVER RTCA DO-178 SOFTWARE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Wind River Professional Services RTCA DO-178 Practice provides software certification services to help our customers address their demanding software
More informationDRAFT. Date: DRAFT Initiated by: AFS-300
DRAFT U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: Airworthiness and Operational Approval of Aircraft Network Security Program (ANSP) Date: DRAFT Initiated
More information7dmX^ Jafaes D. Seipel Manager ^Production and Airworthiness Division, AIR-200
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ORDER FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION National Policy 8130.21H SUBJ: Procedures for Completion and Use of the Authorized Release Certificate, FAA Form 8130-3, Airworthiness
More informationCertification Authorities Software Team (CAST) Position Paper CAST-26
Certification Authorities Software Team (CAST) Position Paper CAST-26 VERIFICATION INDEPENDENCE COMPLETED January 2006 (Rev 0) NOTE: This position paper has been coordinated among the software specialists
More informationFlight Standards Handbook Bulletin for Airworthiness (HBAW)
ORDER: 8300.10 APPENDIX: 3 BULLETIN TYPE: BULLETIN NUMBER: BULLETIN TITLE: Flight Standards Handbook Bulletin for Airworthiness (HBAW) HBAW 96-05C (AMENDED) Air Carrier Operations Specifications Authorization
More informationTurbo Resources International Quality Procedure
TURBO RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL APPROVALS: Revision : 46 Page : 1 of 53 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 1. SCOPE 4 1.1 GENERAL 4 1.2 APPLICATION 5 2. NORMATIVE REFERENCE
More informationDO-178B/C Differences Tool
FAA/AVS DO-178B/C Differences Tool Revision: 8 DATE: 9/16/213 Revision History Date Rev Change summary 7/21/213 Draft 1 Draft Release - prototype 7/22/213 Draft 2 Draft Release for review 7/23/213 Draft
More informationNew Program Quality Requirements for Suppliers (NPQR) For Limited Manufacturing of Components and/or Processes for Engineering Certification
New Program Quality Requirements for Suppliers (NPQR) For Limited Manufacturing of Components and/or Processes for Engineering Certification Revision A New Program Quality Requirements for Suppliers Rev.
More informationTechnical Standard Order
Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Certification Service Washington, D.C. TSO-C119c Effective Date: 4/14/09 Technical Standard Order Subject: TRAFFIC ALERT AND COLLISION
More informationAUDIT SUMMARY REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION MAURITIUS
ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme AUDIT SUMMARY REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION OF MAURITIUS (Port Louis, 22 to 29 September 2000) INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION ICAO
More information074-8432-552 Page 1 of 7 Effective Date: 12/18/03 Software Supplier Process Requirements
Page 1 of 7 Software Supplier Process Requirements 1.0 QUALITY SYSTEM FRAMEWORK 1.1 QUALITY POLICY The Seller shall document and implement a quality program in the form of Quality manual or detailed Quality
More information[Docket No. FAA-2014-0428; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-067-AD; Amendment 39-18205; AD 2015-14-07]
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 42014-42018] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc
More informationAP1000 European 18. Human Factors Engineering Design Control Document
18.2 Human Factors Engineering Program Management The purpose of this section is to describe the goals of the AP1000 human factors engineering program, the technical program to accomplish these goals,
More informationTable of Contents 1. SCOPE... 3 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS... 4 3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 4 4. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM...4-8
Table of Contents 1. SCOPE... 3 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS... 4 3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 4 4. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM...4-8 5. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY...8-9 6. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT... 10 7. PRODUCT
More informationQuality Assurance QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
Revision 2 Page 1 of 40 QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PLAN APPROVALS: Jeff Shouse Signature on File DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE (signature) DATE Rodney Baltzer Signature on File
More informationMeeting DO-178B Software Verification Guidelines with Coverity Integrity Center
Meeting DO-178B Software Verification Guidelines with Coverity Integrity Center May, 2009 Thomas Schultz Director of Product Strategy, Coverity, Inc. Executive Summary Development organizations that create
More informationFIRST CITIZENS BANCSHARES, INC. FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY CHARTER OF THE JOINT AUDIT COMMITTEE
FIRST CITIZENS BANCSHARES, INC. FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY CHARTER OF THE JOINT AUDIT COMMITTEE As amended, restated, and approved by the Boards of Directors on July 28, 2015 This Charter sets
More informationLight-Sport Aircraft Manufacturers Assessment (LSAMA) FINAL REPORT. Production and Airworthiness Division, AIR 200. May 17, 2010
Light-Sport Aircraft Manufacturers Assessment (LSAMA) FINAL REPORT Production and Airworthiness Division, AIR 200 May 17, 2010 Light-Sport Aircraft Manufacturers Assessment Final Report DISCLAIMER This
More informationMATERIALS LICENSE. 1. American Centrifuge Operating, LLC 3. License Number: SNM-2011, Amendment 4
NRC FORM 374 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Page 1 of 8 Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-438), and Title 10, Code of Federal
More informationQualtech Consulting Inc.
Qualtech Consulting Inc. Who We Are Founded in 1996 Based in Lakewood Ranch, Florida Todd R. White, President Solution Provider Airborne Software Certification Airborne Software Certification Ground-Based
More informationWilfred C. LaRochelle Principal Nuclear Consultant HSB Global Standards, USA
Wilfred C. LaRochelle Principal Nuclear Consultant HSB Global Standards, USA ASME Vice President, Conformity Assessment and Vice Chairman of Committee on Nuclear Certification 2nd NRC Workshop on Vendor
More informationGuidance for the Quality Assurance of Fire Protection Systems
Guidance for the Quality Assurance of Fire Protection Systems Prepared for: Office of Energy Research Office of Environment, Safety and Health Technical Support Prepared by: Roy F. Weston, Inc. October
More informationCertification of Civil Avionics
23 Certification of Civil Avionics Frank McCormick Certification Services, Inc. 23.1 Introduction 23.2 Regulatory Basis of the Federal Aviation Administration 23.3 FAA Approvals of Avionics Equipment Technical
More informationMAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES
ORDER DOE O 433.1B Approved: 4-21-2010 MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Health, Safety and Security DOE O 433.1B 1 4-21-2010 MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
More informationCHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PURPOSE The Audit Committee (the Audit Committee ) is appointed by the Board of Directors (the Board ) of NVIDIA Corporation, a Delaware corporation
More informationSection 100 Contractor Quality Control Program
7/21/2014 AC 150/5370-10G Section 100 Contractor Quality Control Program 100-01 General. When the specification requires a Contractor Quality Control Program, the Contractor shall establish, provide, and
More informationNational Home Inspector Certification Council. Policy & Procedures Manual
National Home Inspector Certification Council Policy & Procedures Manual INTRODUCTION The National Home Inspector Certification Council (NHICC) accreditation is an objective and reliable verification.
More information[Docket No. FAA-2015-1273; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-194-AD; Amendment 39-18530; AD 2016-11-03]
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 34867-34871] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc
More information[Docket No. FAA-2015-4812; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-034-AD; Amendment 39-18560; AD 2016-12-11]
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 22, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 40485-40487] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc
More informationACTION PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMA IN THE AFRICA- INDIAN OCEAN REGION. 23 April 2004
ACTION PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMA IN THE AFRICA- INDIAN OCEAN REGION 23 April 2004 Prepared by the AFI RVSM Program Office [ARPO] Revision 23/04/04 AFI STRATEGY/ACTION
More informationPUBLIC RELEASE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Inadequate Contractor Transition Risks Increased System Cost and Delays
PUBLIC RELEASE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Inadequate Contractor Transition Risks Increased System Cost and Delays Inspection Report No. OSE-10084-8-0001 / December 1997 Office of Systems Evaluation PTO
More informationPart-145: Approved Maintenance Organisations (Annex II (EC) 2042/2003)
Part-145: Approved Maintenance Organisations (Annex II (EC) 2042/2003) Juan Anton Maintenance Regulations Manager Flight Standards Directorate EASA Continuing Airworthiness Workshop Kuwait 20-23 October
More informationESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS (MEXICO) -- SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS. (Revised October 5, 2007)
ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS (MEXICO) -- SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 1. GENERAL. (Revised October 5, 2007) 1.1 Any aircraft to be eligible for issue of a certificate of airworthiness and registration issued by the
More informationLAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM ACCREDITATION MANAGER (PROGRAM SPECIALIST 4)
From: To: Subject: Date: Galvan, Jodie Galvan, Jodie Emailing: Job Bulletin Tuesday, June 30, 2015 10:15:40 AM State of Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife invites applications for the position of: Accreditation
More informationSAPHIRE 8 Software Configuration Management Plan
INL/EXT-09-16696 Rev. 1 SAPHIRE 8 Software Configuration Management Plan January 2010 The INL is a U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory operated by Battelle Energy Alliance INL/EXT-09-16696 Rev.
More informationSUMMARY AUDIT REPORT DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL AVIATION OF MOROCCO
ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL AVIATION OF MOROCCO (Rabat, 26 October to 3 November 1999) INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION ICAO UNIVERSAL
More informationGuidance on IRB Continuing Review of Research
NOTE: THIS GUIDANCE SUPERSEDES OHRP S JANUARY 15, 2007 GUIDANCE ENTITILED GUIDANCE ON CONTINUING REVIEW. CLICK HERE FOR THE JANUARY 15, 2007 GUIDANCE. Office for Human Research Protections Department of
More informationGulfstream Production Certificate Operations
SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS SQAR 0001 REV D Supplier s Quality System David H. Trucksis Donald A. Strickland R. Christiansen PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY: Robert W. Mullen Jr.
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. University of Northern Colorado
TABLE OF CONTENTS University of Northern Colorado HIPAA Policies and Procedures Page # Development and Maintenance of HIPAA Policies and Procedures... 1 Procedures for Updating HIPAA Policies and Procedures...
More informationMethods, techniques, and practices contained in manufacturer s Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA),
Subject: MAINTENANCE AND ALTERATION Date: 10/7/02 AC : 120-77 DATA Initiated by: AFS-300 Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) provides one means, but not the only means, of ensuring that the
More information INSTALLATION REPORT OF AUDIT
INSTALLATION REPORT OF AUDIT F2010-0034-FCI000 Impresa Contract Implementation 309th Maintenance Wing Hill AFB UT Hill Area Audit Office 8 March 2010 Executive Summary INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES In January
More information[Docket No. FAA-2016-0462; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-144-AD] Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/08/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-02193, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More information[Docket No. FAA-2010-1205; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-146-AD; Amendment 39-16677; AD 2011-09-15]
Faa Job Aid Conducting Software Reviews Prior To Certification
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2011)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 24345-24349] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2011-9917]
More information[Docket No. FAA-2009-0136; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-171-AD; Amendment 39-16022; AD 2009-19-05]
[Federal Register: September 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 182)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 48138-48141] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr22se09-2] DEPARTMENT
More informationProcedure & Training Manual Flying Training Directorate
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION Opp. Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi Procedure & Training Manual Flying Training Directorate This Manual is produced for the use by DGCA Officials
More informationRTCA DO-178B/EUROCAE ED-12B
27 RTCA DO-178B/EUROCAE ED-12B Thomas K. Ferrell Ferrell and Associates Consulting Uma D. Ferrell Ferrell and Associates Consulting 27.1 Introduction Comparison with Other Software Standards Document Overview
More informationAircraft Certification Service Policy. Aircraft Certification Information Resource Management (IRM) Governance Program
Aircraft Certification Service Policy ORDER 1370.76B Effective Date: 09/28/2009 SUBJ: Aircraft Certification Information Resource Management (IRM) Governance Program 1. Purpose of this Order. a. This order
More informationTRAINING PROGRAM APPROVAL PROCESS FOR APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS (AMOs)
AIRWORTHINESS CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF BOTSWANA ADVISORY CIRCULAR CAAB Document AAC-020 TRAINING PROGRAM APPROVAL PROCESS FOR APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS (AMOs) AAC-020 Revision: Original 07
More information[Docket No. FAA-2010-0856; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-117-AD; Amendment 39-17224; AD 2012-21-08]
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 23, 2012)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 64711-64714] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc
More informationQuality Manual ALABAMA RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT. This Quality Manual complies with the Requirements of ISO 9001:2008.
ALABAMA RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT This complies with the Requirements of ISO 9001:2008. Prepared By: Phyllis Olsen Release Date: 03/19/09 Quality Policy & Objectives s quality policy is to achieve sustained,
More information[Docket No. FAA-2009-0411; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-190-AD; Amendment 39-16095; AD 2009-24-07]
[Federal Register: November 27, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 227)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 62231-62233] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr27no09-12] DEPARTMENT
More informationThis interpretation of the revised Annex
Reprinted from PHARMACEUTICAL ENGINEERING The Official Magazine of ISPE July/August 2011, Vol. 31 No. 4 www.ispe.org Copyright ISPE 2011 The ISPE GAMP Community of Practice (COP) provides its interpretation
More informationPosition Classification Flysheet for Grants Management Series, 1109
Music Conducting Software
Position Classification Flysheet for Grants Management Series, 1109 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...2 COVERAGE...2 ESTABLISHING THE OCCUPATIONAL SERIES AND STANDARD...2 GENERAL SERIES DETERMINATION GUIDELINES...3
More information
FLIGHT TRAINING DEVICES
Advisory Circular AC 60-4(0) APRIL 2003 FLIGHT TRAINING DEVICES CONTENTS References 2. Purpose 3 Status of this AC 4. Introduction 2 5. Initial Evaluations 2 6. Recurrent Evaluations 4 7. Evaluation Team
More informationThe Impact of RTCA DO-178C on Software Development
Cognizant 20-20 Insights The Impact of RTCA DO-178C on Software Development By following DO-178C, organizations can implement aeronautical software with clear and consistent ties to existing systems and
More informationFlyerTech s Airworthiness Management Services. For Aircraft Operators
FlyerTech s Airworthiness Management Services For Aircraft Operators Preamble About FlyerTech FlyerTech Limited is an independent Airline Technical Services Department. We are able to offer the full range
More informationSTS Federal Government Consulting Practice IV&V Offering
STS Federal Government Consulting Practice IV&V Offering WBE Certified GSA Contract GS-35F-0108T For information Please contact: gsa70@stsv.com 2007 by STS, Inc. Outline Background on STS What is IV&V?
More informationCHAPTER 8. FEDERALLY-LISTED ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES
1. INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS. CHAPTER 8. FEDERALLY-LISTED ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES a. General. The Biotic Resources chapter in Appendix A of Order 1050.1E combines information on Federally-listed
More informationSample Quality Management Plan
This reference documents project-specific quality assurance and quality control procedures appropriate to the size, complexity, and nature of the project. Quality improvements are also documented and may
Faa Job Aids
More informationSubject: Air Carrier Maintenance Programs Date: 11/15/12 AC No: 120-16F Initiated by: AFS-300
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: Air Carrier Maintenance Programs Date: 11/15/12 AC No: 120-16F Initiated by: AFS-300 Change: This advisory circular
More informationQuality Assurance Manual for Low Level Radioactive. Waste Disposal Facility
WM 07 Conference, February 25 March 1 2007, Tucson, AZ Quality Assurance Manual for Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility Yasser T. Mohamed Hot Laboratories and Waste Management Center, Egyptian
More information[Docket No. FAA-2015-1990; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-027-AD; Amendment. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/13/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-00004, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationAutomating Code Reviews with Simulink Code Inspector
Automating Code Reviews with Simulink Code Inspector Mirko Conrad, Matt Englehart, Tom Erkkinen, Xiaocang Lin, Appa Rao Nirakh, Bill Potter, Jaya Shankar, Pete Szpak, Jun Yan, Jay Clark The MathWorks,
More informationENEA: THE PROVEN LEADER IN SAFETY CRITICAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS
ENEA: THE PROVEN LEADER IN SAFETY CRITICAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS info@enea.com. www.enea.com For over 40 years, we have been one of the fastest growing avionics consulting companies in the world. Today our
More information